It's obvious that we are starting to see a concerted effort by Brand Republican to turn the Dan Rather thing into proof positive of liberal bias. As opposed to just one guy screwing up.
As I noted earlier, this article on Fox is clearly biased:
Although reporters took turns asking Kerry what his plan for Iraq entailed and how he would have done things differently, the Massachusetts senator did not give a solid answer.
While critics on the right have pointed out this section of an article on Alawi's speech to the UN:
Allawi's two-day visit comes as troop casualties and civilian kidnappings in Iraq have increased, large parts of the country have come under the control of insurgents and doubts have surfaced at the United Nations that democratic elections can be held in January as planned.
Biased? It's just facts. Those silly facts. They are so liberal!
What I love is how conservatives who would never concede that the abuses at Abu Gharaib were signs of systemic problem, now feel very comfortable using the isolated Dan Rather incident as definitive proof of a systemic liberal bias.
More Fox fun, they have no problem admitting that they vetted the Swift boat crap. Strange that a news agency would vet the charges of a 527. But if some organization had to do it I suppose Fox would be the logical choice. They didn't do a good job though as it is full of holes you could drive a boat through.
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)