One thing that has bothered me since the election is how it seemed flipped. Let's say that Bush is the Terrorism President, for the Republicans he represents the man who will stop terror (while for Democrats he represents terror). And let's say Kerry represents a more moderate police enforcement approach to terror. Bush won in the country and Kerry won in the cities. What's strange is that the people in the cities are the ones who should be afraid of the terrorist threat. When we hear about terror plots the target is always Washington, D.C., New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles. The big cities. So how is it that the cities voted for someone painted as being soft on terror, when they are the likely targets?
Posted by jherr at April 14, 2005 07:02 AMThanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)