I watched some of the Republican debate this morning. One question that really shook me was when Huckabee was asked about Rush Limbaugh's comment that his candidacy would destroy the party. I understand that 'Republicanism' has merely been a pretext for 'Rush Limbaugh philosophy' in the last twenty years, but this is a little extreme. Is it just me or is the idea that Rush Limbaugh owns the Republican party embarrassing? There is no equivalent on the Democratic side. No single person controls the party.
Posted by jherr at January 31, 2008 05:01 PMThanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)